Global Upfront Newspapers
Africa America Cover News

U.S. Pentagon rejects Buhari’s offer to relocate AFRICOM to Africa

As expected, the United States (U.S.) has rejected President Muhammadu Buhari’s offer for the relocation of its Africa Command (AFRICOM) from its current base in Germany to Nigeria or any other part of Africa.

The U.S Africa Command (AFRICOM) is one of the 11 unified combatant commands of the U.S. Department of Defence, headquartered at Kelley Barracks, Stuttgart, Germany.

The command partners, counters transnational threats and malign actors, strengthens security forces, and responds to crises in order to advance U.S. national interests and promote regional security, stability, and prosperity.

At the meeting with U.S. Secretary of State, Antony J Blinken on April 27, 2021, President Buhari, in addition to requesting for U.S. military assistance in its war against Boko Haram/Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP), made a sudden volte face, asking for the relocation of AFRICOM headquarters to Africa.

But Pentagon, the headquarters of U.S. Department of Defence, has ruled out any plan to relocate AFRICOM from its current base in Germany to Nigeria or any part of Africa due to the cost of such relocation.

President Buhari had told Secretary Blinken, “the security challenges in Nigeria remain of great concern to us and impacted more negatively, by existing complex negative pressures in the Sahel, Central and West Africa, as well as the Lake Chad Region. Compounded as the situation remains, Nigeria and her security forces remain resolutely committed to containing them and addressing their root causes.

“The support of important and strategic partners like the United States cannot be overstated as the consequences of insecurity will affect all nations, hence the imperative for concerted cooperation and collaboration of all nations to overcome these challenges.

“In this connection, and considering the growing security challenges in West and Central Africa, Gulf of Guinea, Lake Chad region and the Sahel, weighing heavily on Africa, it underscores the need for the United States to consider relocating AFRICOM headquarters from Stuttgart, Germany to Africa and near the Theatre of Operation.”

The Pentagon had told Lagos-based Punch newspaper in an emailed message in response to inquiries that though it would continue to value Nigeria and other countries in Africa as important partners, such consideration as relocation is not on its agenda.

According to the U.S. Pentagon Spokesperson, Ms Cindi King, “it would be inappropriate to speculate on any future actions. However, at this time, moving this headquarters (AFRICOM HQ) to Africa is not part of any plans, but USAFRICOM’s commitment to their mission, our African and other partners, remains as strong today as when we launched this command more than a decade ago.

“Although there is an ongoing Global Posture Review, the relocation of Combatant Command headquarters is outside the scope of its assessment. In the case of AFRICOM, previous studies have concluded that the cost associated with the relocation of this headquarters is significant and likely to incur the expense of other engagement opportunities and activities that more directly benefit our valued African partners.

“We greatly value the partnership with Nigeria and appreciate President Buhari’s recognition of the United States’ positive contribution to African peace and security, as well as other regional partners that have made similar past pronouncements. The United States remains committed to continuing our close partnership with African countries and organisations to promote security and stability.”

Meanwhile, a former U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria, John Campbell, added that it is “unlikely or near impossible” for his country to relocate AFRICOM from Germany to Nigeria or any part of the continent.

Said Campbell, now the Ralph Bunche Senior Fellow for Africa Policy Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, a Washington, DC-based think-tank, “from an American perspective, moving AFRICOM’s headquarters after 14 years in Stuttgart would be a major undertaking.

“However, should the AFRICOM headquarters move, it is unlikely – if not impossible – that it would be to Africa, with its logistical challenges. Some in the US Congress support moving AFRICOM’s headquarters to the United States as a cost-effective alternative. For example, South Carolina’s senators, both Republican, have advocated moving it to Charleston, the site of large US military installations.

“It is mostly a matter of money. Moving AFRICOM to Africa would require the construction of a sophisticated installation in areas where the basic infrastructure may not yet have been developed. Moving it to the United States would mean making use of already existing but underused installation (e.g., perhaps Charleston) that could be quickly and more cheaply expanded, if necessary.”

The ex-envoy, however, said Buhari’s request marked a reversal of Nigeria’s official opposition to AFRICOM plans to move it to the continent 14 years ago.

“The shift likely reflects the conclusion that the security situation in West Africa and Nigeria is out of control, spurring a willingness to consider options hitherto unacceptable. Buhari argued that AFRICOM’s headquarters should be closer to the theatre of operations. He also seemed to imply greater US involvement in West African security, including a kinetic dimension in the context of greater Western support for West Africa’s response to its security threats.”

He recalled that when President George W Bush established AFRICOM in 2007, a military-civilian hybrid command in support of Africa, African official reaction was largely hostile, seeing the effort as “neo-colonialist.”

Campbell said, “The Nigerian government took the lead in persuading or strong-arming other African states against accepting the AFRICOM headquarters, which was thereupon established at Stuttgart, Germany, already the headquarters of the European Command.

“In addition to opposing AFRICOM in the first place, the Nigerian military authorities have been largely uncooperative with the US military. Hence, the US military involvement in Nigeria, beyond limited training operations, is minimal, and the country does not host any American defence installations.

“Successive Nigerian governments have wanted to purchase sophisticated American military equipment but have rejected US oversight. In fact, Nigerian purchases of US military materials have been rare, despite their high-profile, ultimately successful purchase of 12 A-29 Super Tucanos – sophisticated aircraft.”

Also, an Associate Fellow at the United Kingdom-based Chatham House, Matthew Page, said there was no prospect of the US relocating its AFRICOM HQ from Germany to any part of Africa.

Chatham House, also known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is an independent policy institute headquarters whose mission is to provide authoritative commentary on world events and offer solutions to global challenges.

Page said, “There is absolutely no prospect of this happening. A combatant command headquarters is an administrative node that requires enormous physical infrastructure and thousands of personnel (and their families) to sustain it. They need to be able to safely live, work, and send their children to school locally. The Nigerian government is unable to safeguard the lives of hard-working Nigerians, never mind a US military installation that would be a juicy target for a terrorist attack.

“With the exception of European Command and Africa Command – which for longstanding historical reasons are located and headquartered in Germany – all combatant commands are located in the United States. These commands do have forward elements and subordinate commands based in the theatre of operations, such as Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) based in Djibouti. But these typically are task-specific and have a light local footprint. The United States is not – and doesn’t want to be – an imperial power with permanent military outposts on the continent. Nor should African leaders be asking it to become one.”

Page, who was previously with the US Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, further said, “I am sure the Biden administration was puzzled by President Buhari’s invitation, given that Nigeria has been a reluctant and difficult security partner for the United States. The Nigerian Army has long viewed US military engagement in West Africa with deep suspicion, shunning deeper ties and ignoring Washington’s calls for security sector reform and human rights improvements. Inviting AFRICOM to relocate to Nigeria is the equivalent of proposing marriage before going on a first date.”

This story first appeared in PUNCH, https://punchng.com/insecurity-us-wont-relocate-africa-command-to-nigeria-others-pentagon-replies-buhari/

Advertize With Us

See Also:

Twitter Ban: Nigeria Government, President & Supporters, Opens Account On India’s Koo

Global Upfront

FG suspends Twitter operations in Nigeria, escalating war with microblogging network

Global Upfront

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala emerges DG, WTO

Global Upfront

Nigeria’s mobile phone market bounces back in Q3 2020, says IDC

Global Upfront

China signals plan to take full control of Hong Kong, realigning city’s status

Global Upfront

Nigeria records 36,663 confirmed cases with 556 new infections

Global Upfront

Three-day capacity building for Special Advisers, Technical Assistants of Federal Ministers begins in Abuja

Global Upfront

COVID-19: Boris Johnson tests positive, to work from official residence

Global Upfront

Landmines, location within Boko Haram/ISWAP dominated area hampering search and rescue of missing NAF475 Alpha-Jet

Global Upfront

21 Boko Haram/ISWAP terrorists killed in Geidam, gun truck, assorted weapons recovered, says Army

Global Upfront

This website uses Cookies to improve User experience. We assume this is OK...If not, please opt-out! Accept Read More