Global Upfront Newspapers
CoverFeaturesHealthLifeNewsPolitics

What Is Thallium Sulphate? The Intelligence History & Burden of Transparency – An Explainer

By Group Captain Sadeeq Garba Shehu Rtd 

XGT

A breaking report by Daily Trust has injected an unusually sensitive subject into Nigeria’s public space: a formal letter by Nasir El-Rufai asking the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, to clarify reports that the Office of the National Security Adviser allegedly imported thallium sulphate—one of the most dangerous toxic substances known to science.

This is not an ordinary procurement query. It sits at the fault line where toxicology, intelligence history, law, and public trust intersect.

WHY THALLIUM SULPHATE IS NOT “just another chemical”

Historically, thallium sulphate mattered to intelligence services not because it was exotic, but because it was perfectly stealthy, it ticks all the boxes for a weapon of mischief: 

a. Colourless, tasteless, odourless

b. Delayed symptoms (often days or weeks later)

c. Once legally sold as rat poison

d. Extremely difficult to diagnose before modern forensic science

These traits placed it squarely in the Cold War catalogue of deniable poisons—tools associated with clandestine coercion, silent elimination, or intimidation, long before forensic toxicology caught up.

That era is over.

Today, thallium is:

a. Easily traceable through hair, nails, bone and tissue

b. Globally restricted because of its lethality

c. Legally indefensible outside narrow, declared laboratory research.

Which is why its mere mention now triggers alarm bells far beyond public health.

POISONS AS INTELLIGENCE  & SECURITY PROBLEM 

Modern intelligence doctrine has largely abandoned poisons because they are strategically disastrous:

a. They leave forensic trails

b. They create diplomatic explosions

c. They undermine state legitimacy

d. They collapse plausible deniability

In short, poisons don’t stay secret—they boomerang.

This is precisely why many countries moved decades ago to ban or tightly control thallium salts: not only to protect citizens, but to close a covert-action loophole that embarrassed governments and destabilised trust.

WHY EL-RUFAI ’s QUESTIONS ARE LEGITIMATE IN ANY DEMOCRACY 

Strip away politics and personalities, and what remains are standard national-security accountability questions:

What is the intended end-use of a banned toxic substance?

Was it imported under proper chemical or defence permits?

How is it stored, secured, and overseen?

What role do public-health and environmental regulators play?

Were the regulatory agencies informed? 

Has a risk assessment been conducted?

These are not hostile questions. They are the minimum questions any democratic society must ask when extreme-risk materials are involved.

THE WIDER IRONY 

This controversy unfolds against the backdrop of an even more troubling claim attributed to El-Rufai earlier—that the NSA’s phone was tapped, without judicial warrant, to obtain evidence of an alleged arrest order.

Taken together, the optics are grim:

Allegations of unauthorised surveillance of citizens phones by ONSA  without warrant 

Allegations of unlawful counter surveillance of NSA phones by private citizens (Two wrongs) 

Allegations of importation of a lethal poison

Deepening public distrust of security institutions

None of this strengthens national security. All of it weakens it.

THE REAL NATIONAL-SECURITY ISSUE 

The issue is not whether Nigeria’s security services ever need dangerous materials for legitimate purposes.

The issue is process, transparency, legality, and trust.

Modern national security is not just about secrecy; it is about credible oversight. When secrecy expands faster than accountability, legitimacy erodes—and legitimacy is the ultimate force multiplier.

BOTTOM LINE 

Thallium sulphate is not merely a toxic chemical.

It is a historical symbol of an era when states believed secrecy alone justified everything.

That era ended—not because states became kinder, but because law, forensics, and public accountability caught up.

If Nigerian security and intelligence wish to project themselves and the  government they  serve  as a serious, law-bound democracy, then clear, factual, and prompt clarification is not optional. Even the most innocuous issue if hidden by security agencies when they are unearthed by citizens with long shovels, the security agencies and government itself have lost public trust.

Group Captain Sadeeq Garba Shehu (rtd) is a Security & Defence Analyst/Conflict Security & Development Consult Ltd

Advertize With Us

See Also

Russian Flags/Military Intervention: CDS Warns Protesters, Says ‘We Won’t Accept Treason’

Global Upfront

COVID-19 – Davido’s fiance, Chioma, tests positive

Global Upfront

Palestinians Who Were ‘Mysteriously Deported’ To South Africa Had Third-country Approval, Israel Says

Global Upfront

British doctors push addition of runny nose, sore throat and headache as COVID-19 symptoms

Global Upfront

Israeli Defence Minister Addresses Nation, Disagrees With PM Netanyahu Over Judicial Overhaul , Cites Danger To State Security

Global Upfront

Governor Mourns As Kani Ben, Channels TV Cameraman In Bauchi, Dies

Global Upfront

This website uses Cookies to improve User experience. We assume this is OK...If not, please opt-out! Accept Read More