Global Upfront Newspapers
CoverNewsPolitics

Obasanjo Rejects Sack Of Governors By Appeal Court, Says ‘3 Judges Shouldn’t Upturn Millions Of Voters’ Decisions

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has faulted verdicts of the Nigerians judges on the electoral disputes, saying three to five judges should not overturn decisions made by millions of voters during an election.

Speaking in the in wake of the ongoing judgements of the Court of Appeal on the electoral disputes arising from 2023 elections in Nigeria, President Obasanjo described the powers vested in the hands of a few judges as “totally unacceptable.”

Just last week, three Governors were sacked in separate judgements delivered by the judges of the Court of Appeal, decisions have triggered reactions, earning the judiciary more knocks than kudos.

The affected Governors include Dauda Lawal (Zamfara State), Abba Kabir Yusuf (Kano), and Caleb Mutfwang (Plateau State).

Obasanjo, who spoke at the high-level consultation on Rethinking Western Liberal Democracy in Africa held at Green Resort Legacy, Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library, Abeokuta, Ogun State, faulted what he labelled “cathedral pronouncements” by the judges.

According to Obasanjo: “I believe whatever form of democracy we have or whatever system of government we have, three or four men in the judiciary should not be able to overturn the decisions of millions that have voted. Now, we have to find a way to handle that.

“I don’t know what the way will be but, for me, I think it’s totally unacceptable that millions (of votes), maybe 10m on one side, maybe 9million on the other side. Then, you have five people sitting down, three of them agree, two disagree. And you come up and make cathedral pronouncements that cannot be changed, I believe that should not be accepted.

“How do we do it? I don’t know. But whatever form of democracy we have, we should look at how to handle this. If you say ‘go again for election,’ then, what happened to the previous election? I don’t know.

“So, I personally feel strongly about. It does not matter what you say about the judiciary, but in fact only five people or seven will sit down. If they are five, three may agree, two may not agree, and the decision of three will be final. All that you have done comes to the decision of three or decision of four.”

Advertize With Us

See Also

U.S. Pentagon says 2 ‘high-profile’ ISIS-K targets killed, 1 injured in Friday drone strike

Global Upfront

Department of State Hosts Inaugural U.S.-Nigeria Strategic Energy Dialogue

Global Upfront

Covid-19: Vaccines and vaccine passports being sold on darknet

Global Upfront

Security forces rescue hostages of Jibia, Katsina State Mosque kidnap, says Army

Global Upfront

Basketball: Cambage “Go Back To Your Third World Country” Jibe Sparked Australia-Nigeria Brawl Before Tokyo Olympics – O’Hea

Global Upfront

DPO, Others Killed As Anti-Election Militants Attack Awada Police Station, Near Onitsha

Global Upfront

Chaos Is The Point: Zuma’s Empty And Violent Rhetoric Aims To Hurt South Africa’s Democracy

Global Upfront

2023: Group Picks PDP Presidential Ticket Forms For Peter Obi, Says He Will Steer Nigeria Transparently And Effectively To Better Future

Global Upfront

Take fight to Boko Haram/ISWAP terrorists, bandits, Senate President, Lawan, charges new CDS, Service Chiefs

Global Upfront

Terrorism: Act Fast Before People Resort To Self-Help, Arewa Group Tells Buhari, Northern Leaders

Global Upfront

This website uses Cookies to improve User experience. We assume this is OK...If not, please opt-out! Accept Read More