By Abidemi Adebamiwa
Nigeria stands at a turning point, facing significant fiscal hurdles while pursuing ambitious economic objectives. To address these challenges, the government has leaned on external financial strategies that offer immediate relief but come with potential long-term consequences. These decisions will shape the nation’s economic future and its resilience in the face of global uncertainties. Understanding the balance between short-term fixes and sustainable growth is more critical now than ever.
Imagine a family barely scraping by. A quick loan might ease their burden today, but the repayments can create new challenges down the road. Nigeria faces a similar situation. With foreign reserves at $40.17 billion as of October 2024 and external debt reaching $42.9 billion, the country is navigating stormy fiscal waters. Adding to this, Nigeria’s heavy reliance on oil revenue ties its fate to unpredictable global markets—a vulnerability shared with nations like Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, albeit approached differently by each.
Saudi Arabia uses its $100/barrel benchmark to fund transformative projects under Vision 2030. While this is bold, it leaves the nation exposed to oil price drops. Venezuela, however, serves as a cautionary tale of economic mismanagement, where over-reliance on oil led to hyperinflation and collapse. Nigeria’s more cautious $77.96/barrel benchmark offers some stability, but lowering it further could better protect the economy from volatility while building stronger reserves for future challenges.
Lowering the benchmark could also allow Nigeria to save surplus funds in stabilization mechanisms like the Excess Crude Account. These savings can act as a safety net for future uncertainties. However, Nigeria faces hurdles such as oil theft, vandalism, and outdated infrastructure, which prevent it from fully capitalizing on its oil potential. By learning from Saudi Arabia’s ambitious investments and Venezuela’s missteps, Nigeria can craft a balanced and sustainable economic strategy.
One area ripe for reform is Nigeria’s public procurement system, which has long been plagued by inefficiencies, corruption, and a lack of transparency. Enhancing procurement processes could significantly reduce financial leakages and ensure better allocation of resources. Introducing digital tools, stricter regulations, and competitive bidding systems would not only reduce waste but also foster accountability and improve the efficiency of public spending. Coupled with support for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), this could catalyze economic recovery. MSMEs, if empowered, can drive innovation, create jobs, and help diversify the economy beyond its dependence on oil.
Debt servicing already consumes over 70% of Nigeria’s revenue, leaving little room for vital investments in education, healthcare, and infrastructure. This burden is further compounded by the proposed $2.2 billion loan under President Tinubu’s administration. While the government claims to have saved N33.76 trillion ($20 billion) from subsidy removal and Naira float policies, these savings have come at a steep cost to the average Nigerian. Rising fuel and food prices have left many households struggling to make ends meet.
These challenges highlight the gap between fiscal policies and their impact on ordinary citizens. For significant reforms to succeed, the government must establish strong support systems to ease immediate hardships while fostering long-term benefits. Historically, borrowed funds have been used to address short-term needs rather than drive transformative development. A strategic shift is needed to close this gap and create lasting economic resilience.
Other nations provide lessons—both cautionary and inspiring. Argentina’s dependence on foreign loans led to a devastating currency collapse and inflation. Ghana, too, struggled under rising debt, leading to an IMF bailout that imposed harsh austerity measures. On the brighter side, Indonesia’s response to the 1990s Asian Financial Crisis offers a playbook for recovery. By diversifying exports, strengthening regulations, and investing in manufacturing and agriculture, Indonesia transformed its economy into a model of stability.
Borrowing, if guided by clear objectives, can be a powerful tool for progress. Nigeria must prioritize transformative projects like renewable energy and railways—initiatives that promise lasting economic returns. Diversifying revenue streams is equally critical. Over-reliance on oil leaves the economy vulnerable, but expanding exports in agriculture and technology can create more stable income sources.
Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio, at just 6%, is among the lowest globally. Reforming the tax system and cracking down on tax evasion could unlock billions in revenue. Simplified tax policies and improved enforcement could also attract significant foreign direct investment (FDI), bolstering economic stability. Strengthening corporate governance and formalizing businesses, particularly in Northern states, would further enhance revenue generation and reduce reliance on federal allocations.
Foresight and discipline are essential for navigating economic turbulence. Norway’s sovereign wealth funds, built from oil revenues, provide a model of how savings can cushion economies during downturns. Nigeria must adopt policies that bridge the gap between fiscal discipline and social protection, ensuring that decisions like subsidy removal are paired with measures that protect the most vulnerable. By lowering its oil benchmark and saving during booms, Nigeria can prepare for future challenges. Recent claims of $20 billion in savings from subsidy reforms illustrate the potential of disciplined fiscal policies. Subsidy restructuring, modeled on Saudi Arabia, could free up resources for long-term investments.
Structural changes in revenue sharing, such as VAT and lottery rulings, emphasize the urgent need for governance reform, especially in Northern states that heavily depend on Federal Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC) distributions. To remain competitive, these states must modernize industries, adopt corporate governance frameworks, and embrace innovative practices. Formalizing their economies and developing reliable data systems to track consumption and economic activity are also critical. These efforts would not only help Northern states adapt to new fiscal arrangements but also lay a foundation for sustainable economic independence.
Nigerians living abroad also represent an untapped resource. Annual remittances bring significant foreign currency inflows but are mostly spent on private consumption. Well-designed government bond schemes could channel some of these funds into national development projects. Additionally, aligning governance practices with economic realities can create a more balanced and resilient economy for all Nigerians.
As Nigeria navigates its future, deliberate and strategic actions are more critical than ever. Investing in high-impact projects, embracing transparency, and adopting necessary reforms could pave the way for a prosperous nation. By taking bold yet calculated steps, Nigeria can build a legacy of resilience, growth, and shared prosperity for future generations.
Abidemi Adebamiwa writes from Pleasanton, California, USA
