Aphrodisiac Seller, Jaruma, Jailed Over Petition by Ned Nwoko, Actress Wife Regina Daniels, Granted Bail

Hauwa Saidu Mohammed, the Aphrodisiac seller also known as Jaruma has been granted bail by an Upper Area Court in Zuba, Abuja, Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

The controversial Jaruma was granted bail by Barrister Ismail Abdullahi Jibril, the presiding Judge of the Court who said that as part of her bail conditions, she must present a surety who is a Level 12 Officer working within the FCT.

Jaruma is facing a four count- charge of defamation of character, criminal discrimination, injurious falsehood and publishing falsehood to incite the public to hate against billionaire businessman, Prince Ned Nwoko, and his Nollywood actress wife, Regina Daniels.

She pleaded not guilty against the charge and her lawyer applied for bail which was granted.

On Tuesday, the Abuja Upper Area Court had ordered Jaruma to be remanded in Suleija Correctional Centre (prison) following alleged attack on Nwoko on Social Media pending a bail application hearing set for Friday (yesterday).

During the Tuesday session, the Prosecution Counsels, Mr E. A Inegbenoise and Chinedu Ogada, told the court that the complainant, Nwoko reported the matter through a written petition from his Lawyer to FCT Police Command for proper investigation on Jan. 20.

Inegbenoise said that the defendant, used various Social Media platforms, particularly through her Instagram handle to publish falsehood against Nwoko and his wife, Princess Regina to members of the public.

He told the court the defendant gave the false news in order to incite public hatred against Nwoko and his wife to damage their reputation.

Inegbenoise alleged that the defendant through her Instagram handle published that she gave N10 million to Princess Regina Daniels to advertise her illicit product, unknown as Kayanmata.

The prosecutor further said that the defendant published that the complainant and his wife criminally collected her money but failed to deliver the purported contract which never existed.

Inegbenoise, also alleged that the defendant use the product to corrupt public morality through social media advertisement and other unwholesome activities.

He informed the court that the offence contravened the provisions of sections 392, 393, 397 and 418 of the penal code.

The defendant, however, pleaded not guilty to the charge.

The prosecution counsel prayed the court to grant him a date to open his case against the defendant.

“However in view of the fact that the defendant was only arrested Jan 21 and granted bail without having the opportunity to question her, we prayed the court to remand the defendant in police custody for 7 days.

“This is to enable detectives to interrogate her, and execute search warrant in her apartments at her residents,’’ Inegbenoise prayed the court.

Mr James Odibe, counsel to Muhammed, in an oral application for bail, cited sections 35 and 36 (5) of the 1999 constitution and Section 305, 165 (1) of Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.

Odibe told the court that the two parties are celebrities and equally urged the court to grant the defendant bail on self-recognition or in the alternative, in the most liberal terms.

He submitted in addition that the defendant will not jump bail and that she was on police administrative bail.

Related posts

Naval Base Takeoff: Navy Decries Hostility From Mbaikyar Benue Host Community

UK: Rapist Who Filmed Himself Attacking Woman While She Was Unconscious Convicted, Jailed 8 Years, 3 Months in Northampton

Poverty, Professors, And Policy

This website uses Cookies to improve User experience. We assume this is OK...If not, please opt-out! Read More