U.S. At Edge Of War With Russia And China, Warns Henry Kissinger

MOSCOW REGION, RUSSIA. FEBRUARY 3, 2016. Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger looks on during a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin (not pictured) at Novo-Ogaryovo residence. Alexei Nikolsky/Russian Presidential Press and Information Office/TASS Ðîññèÿ. Ìîñêîâñêàÿ îáëàñòü. 3 ôåâðàëÿ 2016. Ýêñ-ãîññåêðåòàðü ÑØÀ Ãåíðè Êèññèíäæåð âî âðåìÿ âñòðå÷è ñ ïðåçèäåíòîì Ðîññèè Âëàäèìèðîì Ïóòèíûì â ðåçèäåíöèè Íîâî-Îãàðåâî. Àëåêñåé Íèêîëüñêèé/ïðåññ-ñëóæáà ïðåçèäåíòà ÐÔ/ÒÀÑÑ

Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger believes that Washington is currently on the brink of war with Moscow and Beijing, he said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal.

“We are at the edge of war with Russia and China on issues which we partly created, without any concept of how this is going to end or what it’s supposed to lead to,” he said.

“You can’t just now say we’re going to split them off and turn them against each other. All you can do is not to accelerate the tensions and to create options, and for that you have to have some purpose,” Kissinger added said in the interview, published on Saturday.

Kissinger previously courted controversy for suggesting that Kiev abandon some of its territorial claims to end the conflict with Russia.

Kissinger, now 99 years old, elaborated on the West’s role in the Ukraine conflict in a recent book profiling prominent post-WWII leaders. He described Russia’s decision to send troops into the country in February as motivated by its own security, as having Ukraine join NATO would move the alliance’s weapons to within 300 miles (480km) of Moscow. Conversely, having Ukraine in its entirety fall under Russian influence would do little to “calm historic European fears of Russian domination.”

Diplomats in Kiev and Washington should have balanced these concerns, he wrote, describing the current conflict in Ukraine as “an outgrowth of a failed strategic dialogue.” Speaking to the Wall Street Journal a month after the book’s publication, Kissinger stood by his insistence that the West should have taken Russian President Vladimir Putin’s security demands seriously, and refused to signal that Ukraine would one day be accepted into the NATO alliance.

In the runup to its military operation in Ukraine, Russia presented the US and NATO with written outlines of its security concerns, which were rejected by both receiving parties.

Kissinger, who in the late 1960s and early 1970s held extensive negotiations with Vietnamese communists even as the US military waged war against them, said that modern American leaders tend to view diplomacy as having “personal relationships with the adversary,” and in words paraphrased by the Wall Street Journal, “tend to view negotiations in missionary, rather than psychological terms, seeking to convert or condemn their interlocutors rather than to penetrate their thinking.”

Instead, Kissinger argued that the US should seek “equilibrium” between itself, Russia, and China.

This term refers to “a kind of balance of power, with an acceptance of the legitimacy of sometimes opposing values,” Kissinger explained. “Because if you believe that the final outcome of your effort has to be the imposition of your values, then I think equilibrium is not possible.”

Related posts

IPOB Disowns Simon Ekpa, Says He’s Leader Of “Criminally Minded” Biafra Liberation Army Unleashing Violence In South East Nigeria

DHQ Decries Tompolo’s “Cheap Blackmail” Sabotage Allegations Against Navy Over Oil Theft

ACF Suspends Chairman Osuman Over Anti-Tinubu ‘Unauthorised Statement’

This website uses Cookies to improve User experience. We assume this is OK...If not, please opt-out! Read More