An Abuja based Political Scientist, Statecraft and Preventive Peacebuilding Practitioner, Dr. Ayokunle
Fagbemi, has tasked President Ahmed Tinubu to immediately “initiate mediating and mitigating directives, proclamations and policy modulations that can emphatically avert the looming #EndBadGovernance 2.0 tagged ‘Fearless in October Protest’ as logical responsiveness to stabilize the Nigerian-State.
He also urged the President to take immediate measures by moving the leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, from detention by the Directorate of State Services (DSS) to a “protected halfway-house safe haven apartment” and release all protesters being detained in Nigeria.
Urging President Tinubu to make the necessary adjustments to his speech for Nigeria’s 64th Independence Anniversary to avert the widely proposed and anticipated “Fearless in October Protest” scheduled to commence on October 1, 2024, Fagbemi pleaded that Mr. President should activate measures that can restore the responsiveness integrity of his administration.
This, he said, is required precursor to renewed citizens trust, confidence, and understanding that citizens are only actively engaged in participatory governance with regards to the prevalent energy crisis.
Dr Fagbemi, who is the Executive Director of Center for Peacebuilding and Socio-Economic Resources Development (CePSERD), spoke while delivering the Keynote Address at the National Association of Seadogs, Pyrates Confraternity, Zuma Deck organized Citizens’ Forum on ENERGY CRISIS IN A BITING ECONOMY, WHAT CITIZENS SAY held on Saturday, September 28, 2024 at the NICON Luxury Hotel, Abuja.
He therefore requested the President to, as a mark of good will and pursuant to the constitutional privileges of his Office, and use to wit, Section 175, on prerogative of mercy and clemency and within the purview of case law interpretations of relevant components of the subsisting criminal and penal codes as per the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).
This Dr Fagbemi stated, should use his office and issue directives to move Nnamdi Kanu to a “protected halfway-house safe haven apartment” and also cause the release of all protesters currently in detention nationwide
Specifically, he asked the President to “consider and implement the following:
- 1) Issue Presidential Directive to the Attorney General of the Federation/Minister of Justice to enter “Nolle prosequi” in respect of the already charged protesters; and facilitate the release of ALL protesters currently in detention nationwide using the #EndSARs and #EndBadGovernance as case studies.
- 2) Issue a Presidential Directive to the Director-General (SSS) to move Citizen Nnamdi Kanu to a “protected halfway-house safe haven apartment” under concurrent oversighting of the Nigeria Correctional Service, and with improved visitation rights of unfettered access by his legal and medical teams pending the resolution of legal bottlenecks to achieve his release and probable acquittal by the judiciary.”
Making copious references to extant legal and policy frameworks, Fagbemi noted that “if functional and properly activated by the concerned agencies of government and incumbent public officials the (August) #EndBadGovernance protests should not have occurred.”
In a statement issued by Dr Fagbemi on the event, he “identified and reviewed the mandates of ten of such agencies that their shortfalls in performance that negatively led to the protest because of what he called incoherent Nigerian-state governance feedback information (data gathering, analyses, and) management system for proventive responses delivery.”
As a panacea, he therefore enjoined Mr. President to issue a Presidential Executive Order for activating an efficient
Framework on Public Institutions Performance and Citizens Reaction Feedback Monitoring for Proactive Responses to harness the activities of all agencies of government as provided for by relevant legal and policy frameworks such as in that of the National Monitoring and Evaluation Policy (2022), SERVICOM, PCC, CSI, ReportGov.Ng, NOA, FCCPC, NERC, etc.
He however observed that for effectiveness and efficiency, it may require appointing a Senior Special Assistant/Coordinator (Feedback Information and Intelligence Analyses for Proactive Response) and strengthening the Office of the Special Adviser on Performance Monitoring and reinforced direct oversighting by the Chief of Staff to the
President and Secretary to the Government of the Federation.
Dr. Ayokunle Fagbemi had earlier summarized his understanding of the major thrust of “What Citizens Say” as being that they want to achieve energy security by a holistic resolution of attendant challenges:
- Citizens are committed to and desirous of facilitating the demystification of “fuel subsidy regime” and the dismantling and exposure of the cabal responsible for sustained energy crisis in Nigeria for apprehension and prosecution.
- Citizens are hopeful that Nigeria can attain optimal levels of energy availability, accessibility and affordability.
- Citizens are convinced that the crime and criminalities entrenched in the petroleum and electricity subsectors of the energy system in Nigeria must be unraveled, culprits transparently prosecuted and appropriately sanctioned.Citizens affirm that the anticorruption crusade must visit the energy sector if we are to achieve
energy security. - Citizens believe that to achieve a meaningful energy availability threshold PBAT must provide leadership required to combat the corruption bedeviling the energy sector.
- Citizens feel that the energy crisis is continuously being propelled by the anti-citizens, pro-elite and anti-development governance frameworks based on a problematic 1999 Constitution, extant legislations and skewed policy frameworks or regulations.
- In lieu of sustainability, citizens are convinced that the FGN under PBAT must provide required
leadership for the Nigerian-state to achieve strategic petroleum reserves for petroleum crude
and premium motor spirit.
Fagbemi therefore urged President Tinubu, a seasoned statecraft practitioner, to be novel in confronting the corruption, elite conspiracy and ganging up of forces that have held the energy sector captive by issuing:
- Presidential Convening Order for a Research Study Group to actualize the proposed burst the energy security/crisis bubble research study involving academia, civil society, technocrats, media practitioners, etc.
- Presidential Intervening Directive for Inter-Ministerial Collaborative pursuit of concerted enlightenment of public officials on the provisions of legal and policy frameworks and citizens’ awareness and public enlightenment thereto for positive action.
- Direct the Council Secretariats of the (i) National Defence Council, (ii) National Security Council, and Nigerian Police Council to prepare appropriate Memorandum for deliberations before each council for the activation of required procedural investigation, apprehension, prosecution, sanctioning and securing of conviction of perpetrators of criminal activities in the energy sector.
In the same vein, Dr. Ayokunle Fagbemi pleaded with the National Assembly leadership under Senator
Godswill Akpabio and Tajudeen Abbas to strictly stick to their constitutionally mandated oversight and refrain from conducting another form of probe concerning Nigeria’s lingering energy security/crisis.
He considered and opined “that any NASS probe shall constitute a distraction, become counterproductive, and shall only create sensations that are merely harmonic vibrations that cannot achieve much.”
However, he requested that the Senate President as Chairman of NASS should: “request that relevant stakeholders furnish the NASS with notarized data, reports and answers to specific questions on the operations in the energy sector; and thereto, constitute a research study group to review submissions by stakeholders to NASS, for independent verification and validation studies on those submissions, and proffer analytic legislative briefing notes for proactive interventions by NASS.”
This approach “should help NASS to overcome the sensational razzmatazz often associated with public hearing probes and mitigate the negative citizens’ perception on NASS integrity and trust deficit.”
He emphasized “that the proposed approach should help NASS receive expert reports from stakeholders that can easily correlate with the outcomes of our earlier proposed disruptive research from the executive branch convened by PBAT and help NASS insulate the legislature from brickbats while concentrating on how to ensure that they facilitate the enabling environment for efficiency in the sector.
The NASS evocation of the stakeholder self-reporting power of oversight we believe should help to encourage energy sector to optimally upscale production e.g. increased crude exploration to 2.5million barrels per day by ensuring that some currently capped wells are uncapped; and ensure that the NNPCL refineries start working to justify the appropriation legislations for their reactivation. The same should be applicable for electricity generation, transmission and distribution to citizens as end users.”
Fagbemi finally recommended that Civil Society and Organized Private Sector Collaboration (particularly IPMAN and DISCOs) should become responsive to citizens’ demands by articulating and aggregating them into synoptic nuggets that can help activate interventions and secure paradigmatic shifts. He implored them as stakeholders to actively and transparently participate in the implementation of our proposed recommendations and charted way forward.