Moscow has threatened to strike British military targets in Ukraine and elsewhere if it finds Kyiv‘s forces used British-supplied long-range missiles to strike Russia.
The Russian foreign ministry summoned British Ambassador Nigel Casey to the Kremlin on Monday and warned him that if Ukrainian forces use British weaponry to attack Russia, Moscow could hit ‘any UK military facility and equipment on Ukrainian territory and beyond’.
The statement issued by the Russian foreign ministry came after Foreign Secretary David Cameron said Ukraine had the right to use British weapons to strike Russia.
Lord Cameron, during a visit to Kyiv last week, said Ukraine ‘absolutely has the right to strike back at Russia’ and that London did not put ‘caveats’ on how Ukrainian forces use weapons supplied by Britain.
Russia’s foreign ministry said Lord Cameron’s remarks recognised that Britain was now de-facto a part of the conflict and contradicted an earlier assurance that long-range weapons given to Ukraine would not be used against Russia.
Moscow’s threat comes Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops based near Ukraine to practice nuclear weapons scenarios in a bid to ‘deter’ adversaries following perceived threats of escalation from Western leaders.
The Russian foreign ministry summoned British Ambassador Nigel Casey (right) to the Kremlin on Monday and warned him that if Ukrainian forces use British weaponry to attack Russia, Moscow could hit ‘any UK military facility and equipment on Ukrainian territory and beyond’
‘Casey was warned that in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory with British weapons, any British military facilities and equipment on the territory of Ukraine and abroad’ could be targeted, Russia’s foreign ministry said Monday.
‘The Ambassador was called upon to reflect on the inevitable catastrophic consequences of such hostile steps by London and immediately refute the belligerent provocative statements of the head of the Foreign Office in the most decisive and unambiguous way.’
Lord Cameron, talking to the media outside St. Michael’s Cathedral in Kyiv last week, said Ukraine had a right to use British weaponry as it sees fit, including firing into Russian territory and lifting a previously held requirement only to fire Storm Shadow missiles within Ukraine.
He said: ‘Ukraine has that right. Just as Russia is striking inside Ukraine, you can quite understand why Ukraine feels the need to make sure it’s defending itself.’
The Kremlin called Lord Cameron’s statement a ‘direct escalation’ of the war in Ukraine deemed ‘dangerous to European security’.
Russia earlier announced that it was planning new nuclear weapons drills, citing ‘threats’ issued by Western leaders, including French leader Emmanuel Macron and British officials.
Russian ‘Yars’ intercontinental ballistic missile launchers are displayed in the Victory Day military parade general rehearsal on the Red Square in Moscow, Russia, May 5 2024
The foreign ministry said Monday that it hoped tactical nuclear weapons drills would cool down ‘hotheads’ in the West who Moscow said were pushing for a direct military confrontation between the US-led NATO military alliance and Russia.
‘They are deliberately leading the situation towards a further escalation of the Ukrainian crisis towards an open military clash between NATO countries and Russia,’ the foreign ministry said, citing remarks from both Lord Cameron and President Macron, and the delivery of US ATACMS to Ukraine.
‘We hope that this event will cool down the ‘hotheads’ in Western capitals.’
Russian forces currently occupy several regions of Ukraine and the Kremlin has claimed to have annexed them and that they are part of Russian territory.
Military drills in the undisclosed ‘near future’ will include practice for the preparation and deployment of non-strategic nuclear weapons, Russia’s defence ministry claimed.
The ministry said today the exercises would be carried out ‘in response to provocative statements and threats by certain Western officials against the Russian Federation’, the Kremlin citing threats to deploy troops in Ukraine.
‘It’s obvious we are talking about statements from Mr. Macron and statements from British representatives,’ Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said when asked by reporters what had prompted the drills, adding: ‘This is a completely new round of escalating tensions. It is unprecedented and requires special measures.’
A Russian diplomat on Monday said Moscow would have to increase its entire missile arsenal as a deterrent following what was framed as the worst breakdown in relations since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.
‘We are now at the stage of open confrontation, which, I hope, will not result in a direct armed conflict,’ Russian Ambassador-at-Large Grigory Mashkov told the state RIA news agency.
Mashkov added that it will now be necessary to take ‘further steps to strengthen the country’s defense capability, including building up the missile arsenal, in order to discourage any potential enemy from testing Russia’s strength.’
He added that Russia was already doing a lot in this area but that more was needed given what he said was the growing threat from the West and the technological advances in most types of missiles, from tactical to inter-continental.
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Russia is set to spend 7.1 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on the military, or more than a third of total government spending, in 2024.
Ramping up drills, Putin reportedly told Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu to prepare missile firing exercises in the near future ‘in order to increase the readiness of non-strategic nuclear forces to fulfil combat missions’.
Troops from the Southern Military District, which borders Ukraine and includes the occupied Ukrainian territories will take part in the drills, the ministry said.
Close Putin ally and former President Dmitry Medvedev said today on Telegram that ‘the number of scoundrels among the Western political elite calling for sending their troops to a non-existent country is expanding’.
‘Now it includes representatives of the US Congress, French and British leadership, and individual madmen from the Baltic states and Poland…’
‘Sending your troops to the territory of…Ukraine will entail the direct entry of their countries into the war, to which we will have to respond.
‘And, alas, not in the territory of… Ukraine. In this case, none of them will be able to hide either on Capitol Hill, or in the Elysee Palace, or in 10 Downing Street.
‘A world catastrophe will come.’
The United States on Monday slammed Moscow’s ‘irresponsible rhetoric’ after Putin ordered nuclear drills near Ukraine.
‘This is an example of the kind of irresponsible rhetoric that we’ve seen from Russia in the past. It’s completely inappropriate given the current security situation,’ Pentagon spokesman Major General Pat Ryder told journalists when asked about the announcement.
‘We’ve not seen any change in their strategic force posture,’ Ryder said, adding: ‘Obviously we’ll continue to monitor.’
As part of a new drive of ‘deterrence’, Russia is also understood to have commissioned a notable Russian political scientist to explore possible avenues for pushing back what is perceived as an encroaching West including nuclear deterrence.
Sergey Karganov, a longtime advisor to Putin and his predecessor Boris Yeltsin, has reportedly been commissioned to carry out eight studies into topics including the ‘theory and practice of nuclear deterrence’ within the context of Russia’s current political climate, and how Russia might go about ‘developing’ such a deterrence with Russia, China, India and Pakistan.
The 71-year-old, who currently heads the Council for Foreign and Defence Policy, is notable for his post-USSR doctrine suggesting Russia should aim to leverage Russian minorities living nearby to spread and maintain its influence in former dominions.
Last year, he called for Russia to launch nuclear strikes on Europe as a pre-emptive measure to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and restore the perceived authority of the nuclear threat.
The escalation of Russian nuclear rhetoric follows weeks of more pronounced threats from the West to intervene in the conflict in Ukraine.
President Macron recently told The Economist he ‘absolutely’ stands by pledges to put boots on the ground in Ukraine if push comes to shove.
‘As I said, I’m not ruling anything out, because we are facing someone who is not ruling anything out,’ he told the magazine in an interview published last Thursday.
Macron has also called on Europe to reduce reliance on the United States and develop independent capacity to face down hostile foreign actors.
In February, Putin warned Macron that if France were to send any troops to Ukraine, they would meet the same fate as Napoleon Bonaparte’s Grand Armée, whose 1812 invasion ended in staggering defeat and huge casualties.
Putin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said comments made on Friday could imperil the entire system of European security architecture – and namechecked Macron while condemning perceived threats from the West.
‘The statement [from Macron] is very important and very dangerous,’ Peskov told reporters on Friday.
Macron ‘continues to constantly talk about the possibility of direct involvement on the ground in the conflict around Ukraine. This is a very dangerous trend,’ he added.
Peskov said the recent statements by Macron and Cameron ‘potentially pose a danger to European security, to the entire European security architecture’.
‘We see a dangerous tendency towards escalation in official statements. This is raising our concern,’ he added.
US House Leader Hakeem Jeffries added to Russian fears with comments in a CBS interview this week that if Ukraine falls ‘there’s a significant likelihood that America will have to get into the conflict — not simply with our money, but with our servicewomen and our servicemen’.
Experts following developments in the war suggest Macron’s comments reflect a new approach of ‘strategic ambiguity’ mirroring threats from Russia.
Vlad Şutea, founder and lead analyst at early warning and threatcasting group T-Intelligence, told MailOnline: ‘Macron is one of the few Western European leaders to understand the value of strategic ambiguity.
‘Putin doesn’t take anything off the table, neither should we. And that includes sending troops, in whichever capacity that is feasible.’
‘Chances are, Macron and other European leaders have outlined implicit thresholds that could prompt direct Western intervention.
‘A scenario warranting action could entail a collapse of the front in the East, leading to further Russian encroachment, posing a threat to cities like Kyiv, Odesa, and, albeit less likely, western regions such as Lviv.
‘Our reading is that the intra-NATO discussions on this topic have not been as hypothetical as believed.
‘One should remember that France also recently signed a security agreement with Moldova and has a robust presence in Romania as part of the NATO battle group that will be elevated to brigade-level in 2025.’
He suggested that criticism of Macron, claiming the comments could invite nuclear Armageddon, played into the Kremlin’s hands.
‘This appears to be typical pro-Russian scaremongering, aimed at dissuading bold Western action,’ he said. ‘The true irresponsibility lies in shying away from confronting Russia.’
‘Weakness invites aggression and this is particularly relevant when talking about Putin’s Russia.’
Amid rising tensions, Macron is today to host Chinese leader Xi Jinping for a state visit in a bid to persuade him to switch positions over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
In Xi’s first visit to Europe since 2019, he is also expected to give talks in Serbia and Hungary.
President Xi has said he wants to find peace in Ukraine but has been a careful ally to Putin and is expected to host the Russian leader in Beijing next month.
In an op-ed for Le Figaro daily, Xi recently said that he wanted to work with the international community to find ways to solve the conflict sparked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, while emphasising that China was ‘neither a party nor a participant’.
‘We hope that peace and stability will return quickly to Europe, and intend to work with France and the entire international community to find good paths to resolve the crisis,’ he wrote.
@Daily Mail (UK)